Main | October 2007 »

September 2007

September 18, 2007

Top 5 Annoyances on the Metro (or subway, or Tube, or whatever)

OK, so as long as I've been riding some sort of subway system on a regular basis (the past 3 years I've lived in DC), I've been compiling a list in my head of all the things that many people do to annoy the living hell out of everyone else while riding the Metro.  I was once again reminded of this as I was commuting in today, and now that I have this wonderfully cathartic way to spill out these annoyances, I'm going to share them with you (don't you feel lucky?):

  1. Tourists.  Yes, I know DC is a tourist destination and they are an unfortunate inevitability; however, that doesn't make them any less annoying.  You're probably thinking how horrible I am right now, that these poor people just don't know any better; but you can't be possibly thinking that when you're stuck in a train full of loud, obnoxious tourists in matching "Kapowski Family Reunion '07" t-shirts yelling across the car at each other at every station "Is this where we get off?".  C'mon, you know I'm right...don't deny your true feelings.
  2. Standing on the left instead of the right.  This goes back to something tourists do because they don't know the sacred escalator rule; but there are residents who do this too.  You know who you are.  People are trying to get to their bus/shuttle/train/office - that's how this rule came to be.  Just move, for crying out loud.  And for all you tourists, there's a saying that goes "When in Rome, do as the Romans do."  It's not hard to look at what everyone else is doing and do the same.  Ignorance is no longer an excuse.
  3. Blocking the train doors.  They are not like elevator doors.  Just because you stick your arm, or leg, or torso, or child in between the doors does not mean they will automatically open.  Those things will clamp down on you like a shark's jaws on...well anything, really.  Plus, if you try to push them open, you can actually break them.  And then the train is put out of commission, and everyone has to get off, which causes delays to the trains behind, which pisses people off...the chain reaction continues.  You don't want to be the person who caused all of that, do you?
  4. Blocking people from getting on/off.  This is where people and/or things are situated in front of the door in such a way as to practically prevent people from getting on or off the train.  This is what I experienced this morning.  Now, what was blocking the door was a wheelchair - an empty one.  Stay with me here...I have nothing against disabled individuals, and they have the same rights as everyone else to ride the Metro; however, just because you're in a wheelchair does not mean you can leave it sitting empty in the middle of the doorway on a crowded train.  The owner of said wheelchair was sitting in a seat next to it.  Meanwhile, people were having a hell of a time (me included) trying to step around that wheelchair to get in and out of the train.  It was, quite simply, a hazard at that point.  The person could've sat in the chair and maneuvered it around when people needed to get in and out.  Instead, he sat there reading his paper and glancing over at his wheelchair every now and then when people started having trouble.  That's just rude.
  5. Leaning against the vertical rail.  Speaking of rude, I can't stand when people lean their entire bodies against the vertical rail and block others from hanging on to it.  It's one thing if you're the only one standing and no one else needs to use it; but when rails to hang on to start to become a valuable commodity to the increasing throngs of riders that are getting on, GET OFF OF THE RAIL.  I'm short - I don't want to stand on my tiptoes to try and reach the overhead rail.  You're not the only one on the train.

So, if you find any of this offensive, then you're probably the one causing the trouble.  Either that or you just don't want to admit I'm right. 

I feel so much better now.

[where: 20006]

September 04, 2007

Rancilio Silvia

Rancilio Silvia
Vital Stats (according to CoffeeGeek.com):
   Avg. Price:
$439
   Machine Type:
Pump, Single Boiler, Reservoir, Semi Auto
   Colors:
Satin Stainless Steel
   
Ranciliosilvia_3

Espresso Machine Cool Board

I love the UK show Top Gear, a car show that isn't your typical, Speed-Channel crap.  If you live in the UK or watch it on BBC America, you know what I mean.  Anyway, they have something called the Cool Wall, which displays pictures of cars that they categorize as Not Cool, Cool, and Sub-Zero.  I was watching their Cool Wall segment this evening and thinking to myself that there ought to be one of those on the web somewhere for espresso machines.  They can be categorized in much the same way, whether they look like crap but can consistently make the much sought-after "God Shots", or they just look slick and don't do much else.

So, I'm going to start posting pictures of espresso machines and let you, dear readers, comment.  Now, I'm just going to post basic info about the machine, because as much of an espresso enthusiast I am, I haven't used all of them myself (unless the manufacturers want to send me machines to try - but I don't think this blog is quite up to that level yet).  That's why I'm relying on you. 

This is what you do - just post your comments on the espresso machine posted.  Cool, Not Cool, or Sub-Zero.  Elaborate if you wish.

September 01, 2007

When Wikis Go Awry

I know this has been circulating for a few weeks (I missed it somehow); but I've just read an interesting article about the software a student developed to identify who was editing Wikipedia entries.  Of course, many large corporations, organizations, and major religions were up in arms over this.  Among the "revelations" listed:

      "- Microsoft tried to cover up the XBOX 360 failure rate


- Apple edit Microsoft entries, adding more negative comments about its rival

- Bill Gates revenge? Microsoft edits Apple entries, adding more negative comments about its rival

- The Vatican edits Irish Catholic politician Gerry Adams page

       - In the 9/11 Wikipedia article, the NRA added that 'Iraq was involved in 9/11'

 
      - Scientology removes criticism and negatives article from Scientology page"


So, how much of this is really a surprise?  If you had a Wikipedia page, wouldn't you remove anything negative?  It's all just spin - PR 101 (of course, we all know the saying "there's no such thing as bad PR").

However, now I'm interested to know how involved Wikipedia is going to get in this whole debacle.  Now that they can see who is editing pages, will they start to ban certain IPs from editing certain pages?  How "human-edited" is Wikipedia going to be in the end?  They already don't allow so-called "advertising" links to be posted in any entries (define "advertising").  How much more will they have to intervene (and should they intervene)?

Where to begin...

Right...so this is my first blog.  I figured that I have so many little things going on in my head, and this would be the best outlet for those thoughts.  I'm certainly not expecting this to be some great success, and I'll warn you now - I'm really not the best or most frequent writer.  This isn't meant to be anything profound, uplifting, extraordinary, etc.  Just my thoughts.

So, if you happen to come across this and stop to read it, then thanks.  I'll do my best to make it as interesting as possible for you.  Oh, and feel free to comment as you see fit. 

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe in Bloglines

Find The Caffeinated Blog Here

  • blogarama - the blog directory
  • Blog Flux Directory
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Personal Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory